1. We have the ABCD2 score which enables us to stratify the risk very well.
在临床上,ABCD2评分有助于风险分层。
2. So ABCD2 score plus MRI might give you a better indication of what the risk actually is.
所以,结合ABCD2评分和头颅影像学表现,能够更好地预测脑卒中复发的风险。
3. That is over the clinical scores, such as the ABCD2 score.
影像学上显示病灶对卒中复发具有更强的预测能力,优于临床评分,如ABCD2评分。
4. ABCD2
4. The additional information about the clinical aspects such as the duration of symptoms or presence of neurological signs is implicated in ABCD2 score.
ABCD2评分主要包括的是一些临床信息,如症状持续时间、神经系统体征的出现等。
5. ABCD2什么意思
5. This score, ABCD2, validated well (c statistics 0·62–0·83 overall, 1012 (21%) of patients were classified as high risk (score 6–7, 8·1% 2-day risk), 2169 (45%) as moderate risk (score 4–5, 4·1%), and 1628 (34%) as low risk (score 0–3, 1·0%).
ABCD2组的分数验证理想(回归分析0.62-0.83);总体上,1012例(21%)患者为高危险(6-7分,2天风险8.1%),2169例(45%)为中度危险(4-5分,2天风险4.1%),1628例(34%低风险(0-3分,2天风险1.0%)。
6. This score, ABCD2, alidated well (c statistics 0·62–0·83 oerall, 1012 (21%) of patients were classified as high risk (score 6–7, 8·1% 2-day risk), 2169 (45%) as moderate risk (score 4–5, 4·1%), and 1628 (34%) as low risk (score 0–3, 1·0%).
ABCD2组的分数验证理想(回归分析0.62-0.83);总体上,1012例(21%)患者为高危险(6-7分,2天风险8.1%),2169例(45%)为中度危险(4-5分,2天风险4.1%),1628例(34%低风险(0-3分,2天风险1.0%)。
7. Existing prognostic scores for stroke risk after TIA validate well on multiple independent cohorts, but the unified ABCD2 score is likely to be most predictive.
提示:在多个独立的队列中,现有的预测分数系统能够很好地预测TIA后脑卒中风险,但是统一的ABCD2分数系统很可能更好。
本文链接: http://abcd2.immuno-online.com/view-722295.html